ভূমিকা

Two Dignities of Man: Social and Individual - Al-Shia The Scientific and Cultural Website of Shia belief Two Dignities of Man: Social and Individual 2021-06-21 313 Views Dignity of Man , Social To explain this, we have to talk in brief about the dignity of man. That it is the man that has originality or the society is to be dealt with in the realm of philosophy, for originality means true human being; and it is the philosopher who can determine what really exists.

Thus, the researchers in this field are indebted to the philosophers, for as long as the principle of social life has not yet been determined, it is impossible to provide proof. It is clear that as the present article does not deal with a philosophical topic, we should suffice ourselves with brief explanations.

The real existence of society is always questioned; however, there is no doubt that many people really exist and each one of them has a special entity, their special attitudes and functions and understand their being by intuitive knowledge. It has not occurred to anyone that the existence of others is hypostatized, for anyone can perceive that their fellow beings exist and that many of the traditions and customs are according to their nature.

In some aspects, they satisfy his needs and in some other aspects, they are in need of him. So, neither the existence of a large multitude of people nor the mutual effects are rejected. If a society has a real entity, it has real single effects. However, if its existence is hypostatized, it has no single effect. However, whatever comes from it, belongs to the members of society.

In the present discussion, the topic will be dealt with in two parts: firstly, does the individual have originality in the active system or the society? Secondly, which one of them is original in the ultimate system? On discussing the originality in an active system, we shall discuss whether the individual has an effect on society and whether the individual has the power to cause his ascent or descent.

Of course, if a society has an independent entity, the discussion is clear; but if the individual himself does not have an independent entity, then the implication is that anyone who enters a group consciously or unconsciously is affected by it and will follow the laws and the traditions.