Perhaps Azam Tariq is himself a closet homosexual who...

Perhaps Azam Tariq is himself a closet homosexual who follows the Sunna attributed to 'Umar by some Sunni groups (see article*'Akhth Umm-Kulthoom* (as)' on this site).

Yazeed used to copulate with his mother and sisters Here we shall cite the following authentic Sunni sources: Tabaqath al Kabeera Volume 5 page 66 Dhikr Abdullah bin Hanzala and Volume 4 page 283 Tareekh ul Khulafa page 209 Dhikr Yazeed Sawqih al Muhriqa page 132 Dhikr Yazeed Mustadrak al Hakim Volume page 522 Al Isaba Volume 3 page 469 Ya Nabi al Mawaddath page 326 Tareekh Ibn Asakir Volume 7 page 275 Fatawi Abdul Hai page 79 Tareekh al Islam Volume 2 page 356 Al Masalaik Sharh Muwatta Imam Malik page 435 We read in Tabaqath : "Abdullah bin Hanzala the Sahaba stated 'By Allah we opposed Yazeed at the point when we feared that stones would reign down on us from the skies.

He was a fasiq who copulated with his mother, sister and daughters, who drank alcohol and did not offer Salat" Now we have these Nasibi such as Afriki and Sipaa-e-Sahaba praising a man who was so filthy he indulged in incest to satisfy his lusts, and these Nasibi deem him to be the lawful successor to Rasulullah (s).

Yazeed bin Mu'awiya's rejection of the Qur'an We shall rely on the following reputable books of Ahl'ul Sunnah: Al Bidayah wa al Nihayah Volume 8 page 204 Dhikr Ras al Husayn Minhajj al Sunnah Volume 2 page 249 Dkikr Yazeed Sharh Foqh Akbar page 73 Dhikr Yazeed Sharh Tafseer Mazhari Volume 5 page 21 Surah Ibrahim Shazrah al Dhahab page 69 Dhikr Shahadth Husayn Maqatahil Husayn Volume 2 page 58 Dhikr Shahdath Husayn Tadhkira Khawwas page 148 Tareekh Tabari Volume 11 pages 21-23 Dhikr 284 Hijri Tafseer Ruh al Ma'ani (commentary of Surah Muhammad) We are citing Tadhkira, Maqathil and Shazarath al Dhabah.

This is also found in the Arabic (non-Leiden) version of the History of Al-Tabari: When the head of Husayn (as), the grandson of the Holy prophet (saws), was presented before Yazeed he recited the couplets of the kaafir Zubayri: "Banu Hashim staged a play for Kingdom there was no news from the skies nether was there any revelation" We have proven from the sources of Ahl'ul Sunnah that Yazeed rejected the concept of revelation; rather he deemed all this a stage for power by Rasulullah (s).

This proves that Yazeed was a kaafir, so what right do these Nasibi have to extol Yazeed, deem him to to the rightful Khalifah over the Muslims and Ameer'ul Momineen?