We all have to die one day and answer our Creator we have...
We all have to die one day and answer our Creator we have cited scores of Sunni sources that highlight Yazeed's deeds, his love of incest, homosexuality, drinking, singing, kufr aqeedah and his killing of Imam Husayn (as). Are we really going to just accept this single hadith in al Bukhari to neutralise all of Yazeed's deeds?
We appeal to justice and shall cite the following replies: Reply One: Imam of Ahl'ul Sunnah Muhammad bin Yahya deemed Bukhari an innovator and amongst Murijee Fathul Baree Volume 13 page 490 Tabaqat Shaafeeya Volume 2 pages 12-13 Tareekh Baghdad Volume 2 page 32 "Imam Yahya deemed Muhammad bin Ismail Bukhari an innovator and a Murijee" Reply Two: Bukhari did not trust the narrations of Imam Jafer Sadiq Bukhari's Nasibi leanings are evident from this reference, and he steered clear of narrating tradition from the Imams from Ahl'ul bayt (as).
This is clear from the fact that he didn't narrate from Imam Ja'far As-Sadiq (as), nor from his son Imam Musa Al-Kathem (as), nor from his son Imam Ali Ar-Reda (as), nor from his son Imam Muhammad Aj-Jawad (as), nor from his grandson Imam Hasan Al Askari (as) who was a contemporary of Bukhari. Why didn't Bukhari narrate from his own contemporary Imam of Ahl'ul Bayt (as)? He narrated only two ahadith from the master of the youth of paradise, Imam Husayn Bin Ali (as).
He only narrated six hadith from his son Imam Ali Bin Al Husayn Zaynul Abideen (as). He only narrated seventy-nine hadith from the City of Knowledge Imam Ali Bin Abi Talib (as)! He also didn't narrate from Al-Hasan Al Muthana son of Imam Hasan (as).
He didn't narrate from Zayd Bin Ali, nor from his son Yahya Bin Zayd, nor from Muhammad Bin Abdullah Bin Hasan Bin Hasan, nor from his brother Ibrahim, nor from Husayn bin Ali bin Hasan bin Hasan, nor from Yahya Bin Abdullah Bin Hasan, nor from Idris bin Abdullah, nor from Muhammad Bin Ja'far, nor from Ibrahim Bin Isma'eel bin Ibrahim bin Hasan bin Hasan, nor from his brother Qasem, nor from Muhammad bin Muhammad bin zayd bin Ali, nor from Ali bin Ja'far Al Aridi, etc.
Reply Three The Sunni Ulema have deemed this narration as worthless Fathul Bari Volume 6 page 120, Kitab Jihad Umdahthul Qari Volume 6 page 648 Irshad Sari Volume 5 page 140 Kitab Jihad Siraaj al Muneer Sharh Jami al Sagheer Volume 2 page 80 The above leading Sunni scholars have rejected this hadith that Nasibi Azam Tariq cited to defend his Imam.