He criticizes sixty false and mistranslated texts.

He criticizes sixty false and mistranslated texts. They are bases on which Wahabists and their forefathers constructed their sect. AS-SIBKI AND Al--HALABI AsSibki's Tabaqatus Shafiiya part 9 page 34: Ahmed Bin Yahya Bin Ismail; Sheik Shihabuddin Al-Jelabi Al-HalabiHe was deceased in 337 I could obtain one of his books consecrated to rebutting Ibn Teimiya's claiming Allah's occupying a locale. The book comprises about fifty pages.

The following is quoted from page 401 of that book: Ashafii when asked about God's attributes says "It is haram forbidden for intellects to present Allah the Exalted. It is haram for illusions to limit Him. It is haram for conjectures to decide Him. It is haram for selves to think about Him. It is haram for minds to deepen in Him. It is haram for senses to cognize Him.

Only what He Has ascribed to Himself in the words of the Prophet (peace be upon him) is excluded." The following is Ahlus-Sunna's opinion in this subject: Allah is anterior and eternal. Nothing is alike Him and He is not equivalent to anything. He enjoys neither locality nor space. He is not influenced by a time or an age. It is impracticable to ask or say 'where' about Him. He is seeable not by means of meeting or any ordinary means. He was when there was no space.

He made the cosmos and arranged the time. Now He is as He was. Page 43: Monotheists agreed upon denial of the Lord's occupying a locality. A faction like Ibn Teimiya is excluded. Page 534: Hadith of amulet Ibn Teimiya cites as an evidence on Allah's existing in a definite point seems to be excerpted from texts of the Torah or the Bible. It is "Our Lord Allah sanctified be Thy Name. Thy affair in the heavens is like Thy affair on the earth.

Thy bestowal is in the heavens." From the hadith " The Throne is above all of that and Allah is above all of that." Ibn Teimiya the dissident understands that Allah is materially above the Throne. Page 83: Promoting Allah against having a locality is evidenced by reports and traditions and sayings of scholars Nullity of Ibn Teimiya's deceitful ideas.

This nullity is proved by Quranic and prophetic texts ( 128 ) AsSibki's TabaqatusShafiiya part 9 page 36: Heretics misallege that they are following course of the worthy ancestors which is monotheism How is it reasonable to believe that the worthy ancestors adopted faiths of anthropomorphism and keep still before emergence of origins of heresy?