(Refer to Muhsin Al-Amin's Ayanush Shia part 1 page 106.

(Refer to Muhsin Al-Amin's Ayanush Shia part 1 page 106.) SheikulIslam Ibn Teimiya identified the foremost individual who get embroiled in this forgery "Husham Bin Al-Hakam was the first man in Islam who claimed Allah's being a corporeality." (Refer to Minhajus Sunna part 1 page 20.) In his Meqalatul Islamiyin Al-Ashari emphasize that the headmost Shias were corporalists. Later on corporalism as a faith was prevalent among followers of this sect. He records their sayings regarding this topic.

Finally he confesses that some of the late Shias shifted into faith of depriving the Lord of the divine names and attributes Tatilism. (Meqalatul Islamiyin part 1 page 1069.) Depending on the previous the Ithnasharites' tending to Tatilism occurred in an early period. Later on we shall provide sayings identifying this date. (The second theme).

Writers of books of the Islamic sects record numerous nasty statements of anthropomorphism and corporalism ascribed to Husham Bin Al-Hakam and his partisans. Abdul-Qahir Al-Baghdadi says "Husham Bin Al-Hakam claims that his god is a corporeality having a definite edge and extremity and being tall wide and deep. His tallness is same as his width." (Al-Farqu Beinel Furaq page 65.) He also records "Husham Bin Salim Al-Jawaliqi is extremist in corporeality and anthropomorphism.

He claims his god's having the same look of humans. He also alleges that his god enjoys the five senses enjoyed by mankind." (Ibid. pages 689.) He also writes down that Younus Bin Abdirrahman Al-Qummi is extremist in anthropomorphism too. He gives examples on that extremity. (Ibid. page 70). Ibn Hazm records "Husham claims that his god is seven ordinary span height.

(Al-Fasl part 5 page 40.) While the writer promises resting upon the reference books of Shias exclusively he totally refers to books of their opponents. Nevertheless he cites Ayanush Shia within his references. Having referred to the position in Ayanush Shia the writer had suggested we could not find the evidence he rested upon. It seems referring to reference books of Shias gives the opposite meaning! The writer rests upon reference books of the Shias' diehard opponents.

This is quite contrary to his promise! The innumerable Shiite reference books suffocated with statements and faiths of promoting the Lord against unfitting matters are listed in the end of that writer's book. What for then does he shun?