ভূমিকা

Shiavault - a Vault of Shia Islamic Books Philosophy and the Vision of Language (routledge Studies in Twentieth-century Philosophy) Ryle and Sellars on Inner-State Reports ========================================== As we saw in chapter 3, Wittgenstein’s use-based theory of meaningfulness in the Tractatus already conceived of the sense of propositions as defined by the regular possibilities of their significant use, including their inferential relations with other propositions in a language as a whole.

Over the decades following the publication of the Tractatus , developments of this holist, inferentialist program of analysis would come to exert an ever broader and more widespread influence over the methods of analytic philosophers. It would play a central methodological role, indeed, in the single development most characteristic of midcentury analytic philosophy.

This was the radical critique undertaken by Austin, Ryle, and Sellars of the various subjectivist, empiricist, or Cartesian theories of mind that had placed the “givenness” of private sense-data or other immediate contents of consciousness at the center of their accounts of knowledge and understanding.

Against these earlier theories, the midcentury philosophers emphasized the essential linguistic articulation of even the most basic perceptual concepts and judgments.[^172] Such judgments, they emphasized, are applied, first and foremost, to the description of objective facts, phenomena, and events, and only secondarily to the “private” phenomena of first-person experience.

In this chapter, I shall explore the historical and methodological implications of this appeal to the “publicity” of linguistic use over against traditional theories of the privacy of experience. When Ryle wrote The Concept of Mind in 1949, his goal was to employ reflection on the “logical geography” of the ordinary concepts of mind and mentality against the claims of the “official doctrine” tracing to Descartes.

This doctrine, with what Ryle characterized as its central dogma of the “ghost in the machine,” presented what to him seemed a strangely divided picture of the mental and physical departments of a human life, treating these as though they were the subject of two largely separate and independent biographies. In response, Ryle suggested a logically unitary analysis of the bearing of “mentalistic” terms on the description of actions and events of ordinary life.