It was thought the moment somebody met the Prophet he would...
It was thought the moment somebody met the Prophet he would encounter a spiritual transformation and from then on he would do nothing except for what was right and appropriate. Such a judgment concerning the Prophet's followers means to be temperate towards their probable wrongdoings and to over-look their errors.
An example of which is their escape in the wars of Uhud and Hunain demonstrating the shaky foundations of their faith and their lack of affection for the Prophet and his sublime aspirations. A research of the verses which deal with their misbehavior with the Prophet at the Holy war of Uhud will reveal the truth to you.
They would certainly have hurried about among you seeking to sow dissension. Among you exist those who hearken for their sake; Allah knows the unjust” [^4] How could we ever consider such a person as Khalid Ibn Walid a just and innocent person while in accordance with some Sunnite writers, he was called by the Prophet as “Saifullah” meaning “God's sword” but, in the year of the capturing of Mecca, he committed terrible crimes and deceitfully killed a group of Bani Hazaimah after having convened a series of military pacts with them.
After the Prophet heard what Khalid had done, he stood facing the Kaaba whilst begging God, he said: “اللّهُمَّ إِنّي أَبرءُ إَلَيْكَ مِمّا صَنَع خالدُ بنُ الوليد”.