ভূমিকা

Shiavault - a Vault of Shia Islamic Books Discussion On Imam-e-zaman(a.t.f.s.) The Benefits of a Hidden Imam Among the discussions concerning Hazrat Baqiyatullah (a.t.f.s.) is his benefit and advantage during the major occultation. This argument is rooted in the fact concerning his perfections. In other words, once, we discuss about a thing whether it has any benefits or not, while on another occasion, we argue as to what is the advantage that one can draw from him.

Thus, the first step that we should take is to separate these two issues. That is, first and foremost, whether the existence of Imam-e-Zaman (a.t.f.s.) has any advantage at all or not. Secondly, is his existence of any use and benefit for us or not? Quite often there are existents that are useful but hold no benefit for us. Sometimes, there are things that, in our view, don't have any advantage or benefit per se.

For example, an herb available in the jungles of Africa cures cold, thereby proving its utility. Now, if thousands are unable to utilize this herb to their advantage, we cannot rule out its usefulness and declare that this herb should be destroyed because it's useless. No, it has its benefits but it is for those suffering with cold to gain from it.

But if those suffering from cold pursue this herb and after using it, realize that it is absolutely ineffective in curing their cold, only then can they say that this herb did not serve our purpose at all. This reasoning can be applied for all things like people, houses, books, stones, etc. but usually these two issues are mixed up and people end up being confused.

Concerning the existence of Imam-e-Zaman (a.t.f.s.), primarily it should be analyzed whether he has any advantage or benefit at all or not. Thereafter, we must evaluate that if we have failed to gain from him, does it imply that he is of no use or was it some lacking on our part to derive benefit from him? Basically, it should be observed what is the meaning of a man being beneficial and advantageous?

Again, prior to this, it must be seen whether the basis of existence of every man is his being useful for others? That is, if something is not useful and advantageous for others, should it be told to cease to exist? Should this be the criterion for granting existent to creatures or no, it is absolutely incorrect to formulate such a norm?