Hind (i.
Hind (i.e., Mu'awiya) and the Book of Allah? Then it (i.e., the pledge of allegiance to his son Yazid) was the first malice that came to the Arabs, as b. `Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him, said. Rather it was the first malice that came to the people, as Abu Ishaq al-Subay'i, may Allah be pleased with him, said. It (i.e., the succession to authority) was, in its nature, -the farthest of all the items of the Peace Treaty from treason.
Also it was, in its conditions, the worthiest of them all of care. It was the most horrible crime in Mu'awiya's life full of crimes. For it (i.e., the Peace Treaty) occurred when the soldiers were disarmed, the standard war wrapped, and the enemy bound himself to fulfill the conditions.
Neither in Medina (the homeland of al-Hasan, peace be on him) nor among the members of the House (, peace be on them) nor among the Shi'ites of al-Hasan and his relatives was a justification to make Mu'awiya fear for his life in this world. Therefore what is this deception? What is the excuse? Weren't those covenants, agreements, and oath the strongest and the most certain words in the dictionaries of the Arabic language?
I (i.e., the author) wonder: Shall we apologize on behalf of Mu'awiya as those honorable ones who are attributed to Islam apologize on behalf of his son Yazid who killed al-Husayn, the grandson of the Apostle of Allah, the best blessing and peace be on him and his grandfather, when they said: "He (i.e., Yazid) was a self conceited young man. The monkeys distracted him. Wine and dissoluteness controlled him?" Therefore where was the experience of Mu'awiya and his claimed cleverness?
Where was his old age and his experience in the matters? This deed of the father (i.e., Mu'awiya) urged the son (i.e., Yazid) to follow his father's example to achieve his ambitions. Thus they cooperated with each other to accomplish the greatest crime in the history of Islam. That was the killing of the two Lords of the youth of Heaven, the two ones of whom there was no third.
Also they cooperated with each other to cut the only means to which the progeny of the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him and his family, was limited. The crime, in this meaning, is direct killing to the historical continuity of the life of the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him and his family! Yes, nevertheless, the two killers were two caliphs in Islam! What a great loss Islam suffered from when its caliphs were of such a kind!