With regard to this subject...

With regard to this subject, there are some features and issues that are unbelievable and I will clarify for the readers so that they see for themselves that this book is not Gospel from God, and to show them that its authors either wanted to attack the Holiness of God and the dignity of His Prophets, or they were in fact ignorant about religious ethics. Thus, they introduced into their writings things that cannot be believed to be God's Gospel.

Here are some of the points: (1) About the bread that Jesus (P) divided and gave to the disciples saying it was his body; this must be untrue. Even two wise persons could not agree on such a false issue. The reason being that he was sitting with them with his physical body. What Jesus (P) gave them was nothing but bread made from flour to eat and they ate it together. His complete body was there nothing has changed at all. The wine in the cup, described as Jesus’ blood is similarly quite untrue.

His blood was flowing through his body. None was shed. In addition, Jesus (P) did tell them clearly that what was in the cup was in fact the fruit of the vine (wine). His thankfulness for the drinking of wine - which is forbidden by God's Gospel - is not sensible. Such a thing is impossible for God's Prophet, thank God. However, if we compare this to another Verse, it would appear that he in fact took the cup and became drunk.

See Matthew 11:19: "The Son of Man-tame eating and drinking, and they say, "Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and "sinners." But wisdom is proved right by her actions." The Holiness of the Lord's Prophet is far above accusations of drinking wine or committing such sins. Also, the true New Testament (Engeel), which was reveled by God to Jesus (P), is more Exalted than to be tainted by such worthless contradiction. Previous…