They claimed in the same story that he mentioned his other son-in-law...

They claimed in the same story that he mentioned his other son-in-law, who is a young man from Bani Abd Shams, and praised him as "a noble son-in-law"; they claim that the Prophet said: "He, the young man from Bani Abd Shams was truthful in his speech and executed his promises to me." They want us to believe that the Prophet praised his Umayyad son-in-law (the Umayyads belong to the tribe of Bani Abd Shams), which in turn means that he was trying to discredit his first son-in-law [‘Ali (as)] who, according to the story, lied to the Prophet, and violated his promises to him by being an unfaithful husband to his daughter!!

Another aim for fabricating this story was to divert the attention from the actual people who angered Fatima az-Zahra (sa), and put ‘Ali (as) under the spotlight as if he was the one who did so.

It was for this reason that they mentioned the following tradition at the beginning of the story: "The Prophet (S) said: "Fatima is part of me, discomforts me that which discomforts her, and harms me that which harms her." They interpret it as: The meaning of this tradition is that Allah prohibited ‘Ali from marrying another woman besides Fatima, which would harm Allah's Messenger!! Previous…