ভূমিকা

Shiavault - a Vault of Shia Islamic Books Authentic Dasein and the Anxious Uncanny Works Cited 1- Ames, Van Meter. “Existentialism and the Arts.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol. 9, No. 3 (March, 1951): 252-256. 2- “ Art: Expressionism’s Father.” TIME Magazine February 17, 2011 3- Aslaksby, Trond. “The Weathered Paintings of Edvard Munch: Artist’s Intention, Conservation, Display-A Triangle of Conflicts.” 1998. Munch Museet . 23, July 2010. 4- Bernstein, Susan.

“It Walks: The Ambulatory Uncanny.” MLN Vol. 118, No. 5 (December 2003): 1111-1139. 5- Bischoff, Ulrich. Munch . Köln: Taschen, 2000. 6- Bruin, John. “Heidegger and Two Kinds of Art.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol. 52, No. 4 (Autumn, 1994): 447-457. 7- Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful . London, 1782. 8- Carroll, Karen Lee. “Artistic Beginnings: The Work of Young Edvard Munch.” Studies in Art Education Vol.

36, No. 1 (Autumn, 1994): 7-17 9- Cassirer, Ernst and Krois, John Michael. “Mind and Life: Heidegger (An Unpublished Manuscript).” Philosophy & Rhetoric Vol. 16, No. 3 (1983): 160-166. 10- Crockett, Campbell. “Norwegian Arts and Habits.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol. 14, No. 1 (1955): 58-65 11- Di Piero, W. S. “On Edvard Munch.” The Yale Review Vol. 98, No. 1 (January, 2010): 58-64. 12- Ehrenpreis, David. “The figure of the Backfisch: Representing Puberty in Wilhelmine Germany.

Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschicte Vol. 67, No. 4 (2004): 479-508. 13- “Expressive Theory of Art.” Stuckism Wales and the Wrexham Stuckists . Stuckism Wales. Web. June 2011. 14- Forssman, Erik. “Edvard Munch: Sein Werk und die Kunstwissenschaft Heute.” Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschite Vol. 3, No. 23 (1994): 521-532. 15- Fricke, Christel. “Explaining the Inexplicable. The Hypotheses of the Faculty of Reflective Judgment in Kant’s Third Critique.” Noûs Vol. 24, No. 1 (March, 1990):45-62.

16- Gerner, Cornelia. “Salome, Vampire and Madonna: Imager of Women in the Work of Edvard Munch.” Munch Revisited: Edvard Munch and the Art of Today . Ed. Rosemarie E. Pahlke. Dortmund: Kerber Verlag. 2005. 26-34 17- Ginsborg, Hannah*.* “Kant’s Aesthetics and Teleology.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . 2005. February 14, 2010. 18- Guyer, Paul. “Kant’s Distinction between the Beautiful and the Sublime.” The Review of Metaphysics Vol. 35, (June, 1982): 753-783. 19- Harman, Graham.

Heidegger Explained, From Phenomenon to Thing .