We shall argue with reference to the first challenge that...

We shall argue with reference to the first challenge that contemporary comparative theology should be regarded as the continuance of a longstanding Western Christian theological engagement with non-Christian and non-Western thought, especially as found in the theology of mediaeval Scholasticism, and above all in the work of Thomas Aquinas. Contemporary comparative theology thus stands within an established understanding of how Christian theology may be done.

Comparative theologians are certainly keen to categorise their work as theology rather than religious studies.

Nonetheless, contemporary comparative theologians are rightly criticised for showing a reluctance to make critical judgements, especially negative ones, about the truth and value of the traditions they study, in marked contrast to the approach of earlier engagements such as Scholastic theology.[^8] Moreover, the radical diversity of Christian theological traditions and positions in the modern period that form the basis on which different comparative theologians work result in theologies that are often incompatible with the Christian theology found in earlier engagements as well as that found in other contemporary theologies, comparative or otherwise.

With regard to the second challenge, contemporary comparative theology does promote a dialogical understanding of theology that encourages…