ভূমিকা

Shiavault - a Vault of Shia Islamic Books Discussion On Imam-e-zaman Reapparance of Imam-e-zaman (a.t.f.s.) vis-à-vis excess of oppression and injustice Among the important discussions that are being debated in the society nowadays and many have been unable to find a suitable answer to it is the question: Is it necessary and essential for the world to be replete with injustice and oppression to enable Imam-e-Zaman (a.t.f.s.) to reappear?

Will he (a.t.f.s.) not come if there is not enough of oppression and tyranny? Moreover in furtherance to these questions, another query is raised: Then should we increase oppression and injustice to prepare the ground for his reappearance or no, this is not our duty? Since this discussion is not yet clear for the common people, hence numerous misconceptions and wrong notions have cropped up in their minds.

Consequently, some even have the idea that any step taken in the way of reformation is a step backwards vis-à-vis the reappearance of Imam-e-Zaman (a.t.f.s.) and hence, we must do our best to spread mischief and corruption in the land so that he (a.t.f.s.) comes faster. On analyzing these questions, we realized that incidentally the question of spreading mischief and corruption, notwithstanding its absurdity and inanity, is a theory with revolutionary face in the modern world.

The originator of such an idea was Karl Marx who propounded, “Till discontent does not reach boiling point, revolution cannot occur.” Then, following the instructions of Marx, what should be done? Definitely, one must try to increase mischief in the land and create as many hindrances as possible in the way of reformations and improvements in order to augment discontent to pave the path for a revolution!!

Therefore, the communists were of the view that we must enter the intelligence service, torture the people, torment the innocent, pluck out their nails, etc. so that when they are released from the prisons, they will abuse the government and help the people develop a negative opinion about the rulers. Marxists doctors also refrained from treating the sick in hospitals and clinics and created such delays in their treatment that the sick would die.

This would anger the relatives of the deceased who formed the view that doctors of government hospitals don’t treat the patients and act as catalysts in reaching them to the graveyard. All these steps were taken to increase discontent among the people to pave the way for a revolution of the proletariat.