According to history and Islamic tradition...

According to history and Islamic tradition, when ever you see the 'verse of hijab ' referred to, for instance, "such and such was the case before the revelation of 'the verse of hijab " " or "such and such was the case after the revelation of 'the verse of hijab "", it refers to this verse which relates to the wives of the Prophet and not the verses of Surah Nur which states, "Say to the believing men that they cast down their glance and guard their private parts. That is purer for them.

Surely God is Aware of what they do. And say to the believing women that they cast down their glance..." (24: 31). Or the verse of Surah Ahzab which states, "O Prophet! Say to thy wives and daughters and the believing women that they draw their outer garments (jilabib) close to them . So it is more likely that they will be known and not hurt.

God is All-forgiving, All-compassionate." (33:59) But there is a question as to why, in the recent era, the current expression of the religious jurisprudents, that is, satr , did not become prevalent instead of hijab ? The reason is unknown to me. Perhaps they mistook the Islamic hijab for the hijab which is traditional in other countries. We will give further explanation about this later.

The Real Visage of the Modest Dress The fact is that the covering or its new expression, hijab , is not concerned with whether or not it is good for a woman to appear in society covered or uncovered . The point is whether or not a woman and a man's need of her should be a limitless, free association or not. Should a man have the right to satisfy his needs with every woman and in every place short of committing adultery? Islam, which looks at the spirit of the problem, answers: No.

Men are only allowed to satisfy their sexual desires with their legal wives within a marital situation based upon the laws of marriage which establish a series of heavy commitments. It is forbidden for men to have any physical relations with women they are not related to by marriage. It is true that the question externally appears to be, "What should a woman do?" Must she leave her home covered or uncovered?

That is, the person about whom the question is raised is a woman and the question is often expressed in very heart-rendering tones, "Is it better for a woman to be free or condemned and imprisoned in the modest dress?" But something else lies at the root of the question.