ভূমিকা

Shiavault - a Vault of Shia Islamic Books A Hundred and One Rules in Arabic Grammar! The Pedagogy Section The Explicit/Implicit Controversy Although many professionals agree on the benefits of some grammar instruction, the question of how to teach grammar has met with little agreement. The controversy has become particularly acute with the advent of the communicative language teaching revolution, which has consistently underscored the importance of stressing meaning over form.

For years, our profession has been grappling with polarized views concerning the teaching of grammar within a communicative framework. Some scholars (Higgs and Clifford 1982) advocate an explicit method of grammar instruction, with direct teacher explanations followed by related manipulative exercises. Many of us have probably experienced this method of grammar instruction, since most textbooks tend to present grammar in this fashion.

Unfortunately, many of the textbooks' manipulative drills are grounded in shallow and artificial contexts, so these drills become rather meaningless to students. Another problem with explicit grammar instruction is that it advocates a direct and overt role on the part of the teacher. Consequently, this practice designates a rather passive role on the part of the students.

Interaction for them is supposed to take place after the explanation and after a plenty of structural manipulation of the grammatical elements. In Rivers' (1983) terms, "skill-getting" should be stressed before "skill-using." On the other side of the spectrum, implicit grammar explanation as espoused by Krashen (1985), Terrel (1977), and Dulay and Burt (1973) reject the need for formal grammar analysis.

These researchers argue that students can acquire language naturally if they are provided with sufficient comprehensible input from the teacher. In other words, if students are exposed to a sufficient amount of comprehensible input, they will eventually be able to hypothesize and determine the functions as well as the meanings of linguistic forms. Theoretically, the learners should be able to do the hypothesizing on their own.

However, Herron and Tomasello (1992) advise that the inductive method cannot guarantee that the learner will discover the underlying concepts or that the induced concepts will actually be correct.