ভূমিকা
Shiavault - a Vault of Shia Islamic Books A Victim Lost in Saqifah 1-4 a Victim Lost in Saqifah Vol. 2 Discourse One Criticism and Investigation about Propaganda of Silence of Amirul Momineen (a.s.) Doubts Created Regarding Silence of Amirul Momineen (a.s.) Deviated analyses regarding the silence of Amirul Momineen (a.s.) can be divided into three categories: First Category: Conjectures that claim ‘Letting go of Caliphate linked with consent’ One of the most important deviated consequences of this conjecture is release of Abu Bakr’s regime from the circle of usurpation and granting legitimacy to his Caliphate.
This partiality in the sources of Ahle Sunnat has succeeded in giving false coverings based on ‘immediate Bay’at ’ of His Eminence, to Abu Bakr. By the same argument, sometimes instead of ‘Letting go of Caliphate linked with consent’ they talk about ‘Willful Bay’at of Amirul Momineen (a.s.) to Abu Bakr’ and that also in the initial period of his Caliphate!
Style of criticizing the first category of conjectures**[1]** Absurd claims of ‘Willing renouncement of Caliphate’ can be reviewed on the basis of two kinds of authentic documents: A) Documents indicating ‘efforts of Amirul Momineen (a.s.) in bringing down the usurped caliphate of Abu Bakr’. B) Documents indicating ‘Forced demand of Bay’at’ and ‘severe opposition of Amirul Momineen (a.s.) from accepting it’.
[Documents and sources of siege on the house of Fatima (s.a.)] Second Category: Conjectures that claim ‘Detachment of Amirul Momineen (a.s.) from Caliphate and overlooking it, after six months of Abu Bakr’ Caliphate’ One of the most important evil results of these doubts is forgetting the historical documents regarding attack on the house of Fatima (s.a.).
Because in this deviated partiality that talks of the allegiance of Amirul Momineen (a.s.) to Abu Bakr after some months they have very cleverly put a lid on the oppressions and plots that were the highlights of the initial period of [1] Refer: Ali Labbaf: A Victim Lost in Saqifah, Vol. 4, Section 1, Discourse 1 and 2cc Abu Bakr’s rule.
In the same way among the other deviated repercussions of this conjecture is that it becomes the basis to subsequent claims of ‘good relations of Ali and Caliphs’. This also goes a long way in making all forget the terrible crimes committed by usurpers of Caliphate in the initial period.