So, the analogy, due to this case, is based on this cause...

So, the analogy, due to this case, is based on this cause which leads to the taboo of every thing which causes drunkenness. Making Use of Analogy in Applications of Jurisprudence Principles It is obvious that the first stage of inductive reasoning entails the application of the original principles on the facts which they fall under. This is, of course, an analogy process which is founded on the scientific analogy rules; and are too considerable, in number, for the scholars to take time with.

After the jusrist becomes quite sure that the prohibition gives the meaning of taboo and at the same time when the jurist or the Islamic political researcher faces any text which falls under the prohibition found in the Qur'an, such as; "And do not incline to those who are unjust, lest the fire touch you"( ), he would apply some of the factual rules as follows: A.

Appearance of the evidence rule, that is to say, the useful, common meaning; is a kind of obligatory evidence for both sides (the speaker and listener). B. Appearance of the rule of prohibition formula that deals with taboo: i.e., the prohibition formula has the meaning of obligatory stoppage (unless there is a related sign used for giving permission to something being prohibited; in that case, the prohibition assumes the meaning of abhorrence (it is better not to do an act).

Therefore, when the deductive equation is in order with regard to the analogy principles, the deducer and researcher would be able to obtain a legitimate verdict with a moral, political status. So, the operation is functioning due to the said holy verse that warns us against being inclined to those who are unjust.

Here, the prohibition gives the meaning of taboo, so, as a result of this, the `inclining to the unjust' is a sort of taboo, because it is something prohibited in the text of the said verse. In this way, applying the factual methods, with regard to its themes, is due to the scientific analogy method.

So, some of the fundamental, great scholars, such as; Al-Na'ini, the book investigator, has determined the following: `The factual rule should be the greatest when dealt with in the analogy of deduction for the diligent task should naturally depend on that kind of analogy'. The logical analogy has been employed as a practical method in applying the jurisprudence principles, on the one hand, and as a deducing process of the Islamic thought and verdicts, on the other.