What you just said about Uzair (as) being the son of God...

What you just said about Uzair (as) being the son of God goes against you because just now, you said that a high-ranking person can call a stranger with whom he has no blood relationship his son and it is clear that he did not give birth to this person. So, you may also have seen people with high status calling a stranger their brother, or leader, or father, or master and all of these phrases are said out of respect and honour.

So, the more respect a person has for another, he may call him with a higher title of praise and respect. Now that this is proven and clear to you, it will be alright for you to call Musa (as) the brother of God, or His leader or father or master because it is proven that Musa (as) has a greater status than Uzair (as). So, if God made Uzair (as) His son out of honour, then Musa (as) who possesses a higher status should be given a higher position, like His leader or uncle or lord.

So will it be correct in your opinion if Musa (as) is called as the brother of God or His leader or uncle or boss or master?” Upon hearing this question from (S), all the Jewish scholars were baffled and worried and said : ‘Oh Muhammad, give us time to think over what you said.’ The Prophet (S) replied: “Yes, do think it over but think with an unbiased heart.

May Allah show you the right path.” Part 2: Debate with Christians Part 2: Debate with Christians [^3] The Prophet (S) then turned towards Christians and started debate… The Prophet (S) said: “You say that the qadeem [eternally pre-existent] God united with His son Messiah [Jesus, Prophet Isa (as)].

So, in other words, you are implying that qadeem (God, eternally pre-existent) became haadith (something with a beginning) because of a haadith [Prophet Isa (as)] and so haadith [Prophet Isa (as)] became qadeem , just like God is. [means that an eternal being became contingent and the contingent became eternal].[^4] Or maybe what you mean by ‘God united with His son’ is that God specially blessed him and did not bless anyone with the same dignity and respect.

So, if by this you meant that qadeem God became haadith , then you are completely wrong. This is because it is impossible for a qadeem [eternally pre-existent] to become haadith through some revolutionary means. And if you say that haadith became qadeem then this is also incorrect because, just like how a qadeem cannot become haadith , a haadith cannot become qadeem.