If an agent uses the property in a manner that was not authorised – for example, he wears a piece of clothing that he was told to sell – and afterwards disposes of it as he was authorised, that disposal is valid. [1] The difference between a ‘contract’ and a ‘unilateral instigation’ is as follows: with a contract, two parties are required – one to make the offer and the other to accept it. Marriage, therefore, is an example of a contract.
In contrast, in a unilateral instigation, one party alone executes the transaction, as is the case with divorce. [2] Ruling 2091 provides further clarification of this term: it refers to someone who spends his wealth in futile ways. [3] Iḥrām here refers to the state of ritual consecration of pilgrims during hajj and ʿumrah. [4] As mentioned in Ruling 6, the term ‘problematic’ (maḥall al‑ishkāl) amounts to saying the ruling is based on obligatory precaution.
CHAPTER TWENTY » Loan (Qarḍ) CHAPTER EIGHTEEN » Those Prohibited from having Disposal over their Property العربية فارسی اردو English Azərbaycan Türkçe Français