However...

However, there has to be some creation, even at a minute scale which was origin of further creations.\u00a0 The evolutionist scientist, Pierre Paul Grass\u00e9 [35] concedes this and summarises what the concept of accepting \u201ccoincidence\u201d and \u201cchance\u201d means for evolutionists: \u201cChance becomes a sort of providence, which, under the cover of atheism, is not named, but which is secretly worshipped.\u201d Hence, evolutionists, despite knowing the fact that numerous signs within an extremely well-constructed, organised and structured universe point towards the existence of a Creator, but still choose to disbelieve in God – and \u201cworship\u201d chance and coincidence in the hope that they are correct.

\n Therefore, the theory of evolution is more like a creation myth than a scientific theory. A myth neither be proved, nor disproved, with the technology of the culture; a myth requires faith. Evolutionists must have faith that living organisms appeared spontaneously from non-living matter on earth (abiogenesis) but again, the non-living matter was also being created and that cannot be created from chance. [36] \n The evolutionists would then say, from where did God come from?

Did man create the concept of God? How did we learn about our Creator? So, we go to the next step, how God Exists? \n Islam on the existence of God: \n In a long tradition, 8 th successor of the Prophet (c. 766 \u2013818) [37] said to an atheist: \n \u2018And if it was so that the word was our word (Existence of Allah), wouldn\u2019t you be destroyed and we would be Saved (if there happens to be a God)?\u2019 So, he said, \u2018May Allah have Mercy on you!

Help me to find out how He is and where He is?\u2019 \n So, he (the successor) replied: That description for Him is wrong. He is \u2018where\u2019 without a \u2018where\u2019, and \u2018how\u2019 without the \u2018how\u2019, so He cannot be recognised by the \u2018how-ness\u2019 nor by the \u2018where-ness\u2019, nor can He be attained by the feelings, nor can He be compared with anything\u2019.

\n The man said, \u2018So He is \u2018nothing\u2019 when He cannot be realised by the feelings from the senses\u2019. \u00a0So, he was told! \u2018Your senses are unable to realise Him, so you are denying His Lordship, and as for us, when our senses are unable to realise Him, we are even more convinced that He is our Lord, as a different \u2018thing\u2019 from the things\u2019.