As for the significance of the hadith...

As for the significance of the hadith, it is necessary to mention three things: The first thing: The full actor does not need to do the end, but his goal requires his perfection, for example, the generous by nature when issued by generosity, it does not issue from him for an end, as his generosity is subjective to him does not need to highlight his generosity to an end, but his goal is the requirement of his generosity, that is, the requirement of his generosity to be honoured, not that he has a purpose behind his honour, as well as the mother who is nostalgic for her child, highlighting tenderness The child does not have a purpose or need to highlight it, but the appearance of her tenderness is the requirement of motherhood, and therefore it is said: «the full actor does not complete his purpose» and the meaning of this is that he does not need the end, but the end of his action is the requirement of his perfection, and this is what is launched on the Almighty Bari, Allah Almighty blessed and exalted for what was a horse abundant was the requirement of perfection the appearance of his goodness and abundance, not that he has a purpose behind the abundance of his existence, but that is the requirement of perfection itself, it is perfect the appearance of perfection; The emergence of perfection is a form of perfection, and therefore the requirement of perfection blessed and exalted the appearance of its quality, abundance and giving, not for the need behind it.

The second thing: The expression of «I loved» is the expression of «I needed», and the conversation did not say «I was a hidden treasure so I needed to know», but said «I was a hidden treasure and I liked to know», and it is clear that love is a kind of kindness, and a kind of gratitude, not a colour of need, as the father says I loved my son and I gave him such, and the mother says I loved my son and I gave him such, love is a kind of charity and gratitude and not a kind of need.