Are the both equal in similitude?

Are the both equal in similitude?" [^1] He will have no right to turn to one particular ideology” [^2] In the words of Martyr Mutahhari (may his spirit be sanctified): “Basically ideology is founded on one’s overall view…Ideology is a kind of practical wisdom, whereas conception is a kind of theoretic wisdom.” [^3] Learned teacher, Martyr Sadr (may Allah sanctify his Spirit) says: “The question of social existence is related to the reality of life, and it would not take it correct shape unless it is based on if central set of beliefs explaining existence, its reality and limits.

But the capitalist system lacks such a foundation, and it involves deceit and misleading, or haste and impatience, when the real question of existence is put in a freeze separating it from the social issue which is separately studied.” [^4] Referring to the text of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, we find that it entirely ignores this vital question, despite the fact that it is related to same issues. We shall, Cod willing, return to this subject again.

For the present, it is important for us to perceive correctly what is meant by "Right" and "Humanity", so that we could logically proceed to comprehend the stages of the development of human rights. The Right Going back to the root of this term, we find that it implies fixed, permanent and unchangeable, at least this is how it is applied. In these terms, Allah, the Most High, is Right. No alteration is conceivable concerning Almighty Allah.

A piece of news is right if it conforms to reality at the time of reporting, and there can be no basis for imagining and alteration in facts, in spite of the unfounded claims of the "relativists". This is the real implication neither imagined nor derived. Yet, in this manner a nominal concept and view has been formulated and called by this word, and brought to use I respect of social relations and individual conduct, such as: The Right to Freedom.

Consequently, social rights must cover two elements: Firstly, Growing from a real condition (genetic composition, real interest...), and Secondly, conforming to legal or conventional standards in order to organize Social life. It may be argued: The first criterion alone would suffice to prove the right, but the social reaction naturally requires constant need, which convention has turned into it legal condition.