[^4] Ethika Nikomacheia (EN) 1140b 4 et seq.

[^4] Ethika Nikomacheia (EN) 1140b 4 et seq.; see also 1140b 20 et seq.. I take aristotelian texts in their english translation from W.D. Ross and J.A. Smith (eds.), The Works of Aristotle Translated into English (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908-1952). [^5] EN 1142a 34 et seqq. [^6] EN 1139a 26 et seqq. [^7] EN 1105b 10 et seqq. [^8] EN 1103a 32 et seq.

[^9] Aristotle, in some parts of EN VI, suggests that genuine wisdom belongs to gods (EN 1141a 22; 1145a 9-11), but also that man must, in his knowledge and behaviour, aspire to the divine, for man really is what there is of divine in him (EN 1178a 25 et seqq.). [^10] EN II [^9]: [^11] EN 1140a [^26]: [^12] Meta 980a [^22]: [^13] EN 1104a 10-[^14]: [^14] EN X 6-[^8]: [^15] ‘The extraordinary: everything’. Jorge Guillén put it like this and it is difficult to get more into fewer words. [^16] P.

Duhem: La théorie physique. Marcel Rivière, Paris, 1914, p. [^337]: [^17] Duhem, op. cit., p. [^390]: [^18] Duhem, op. cit., p. [^391]: [^19] EN 1138b 22-[^25]: [^20] EN 1106b 36 et seq. [^21] P. Ricœur: La métaphore vive, Du Seuil, Paris, [^1975]: See also, for example, Poetics 1448b 34 and the note added by V. García Yebra in his excellent, erudite and highly documented translation (1992, pp 138 and 257, note 68). [^22] M.

Heidegger: ‘Die Frage Nach Der Technik’, in Martin Heidegger: Die Technik und Die Kehre. Neske Verlag, Tübingen, 1962, pp. 5 and ff. [^23] Aristotle: Poetics 1448b 17; author’s translation following García Yebra, 1974 (see note 21 above). [^24] I take this interpretation of the Aristotelian theory of action from Lear (1995): Aristotle. The Desire to Understand.

Cambridge University Press, [^1988]: The practical syllogism would only be a dried, fossilized version of this living characterization which is integrated into human action. The practical syllogism would be a logikós study of the action. While this characterization adopts the physikós way, it seeks to tell us what the action is really like, which is not the sum of wish plus intellect, but desire-differentiated-by-intellect.

Logical analysis is necessary, but if we go no further than the logical analysis of what physically is the same, we are preparing the ground for ‘the schizophrenia of modern man’. [^25] Rhet 1410b 10-[^19]: [^26] Rhet 1371b 4 and f.. [^27] S. Mas Torres, ‘Platón y Aristóteles: sobre filosofía y poesía’, in D. Sánchez Meca and J.