But, it is compulsory for both sides to study the hopes and...
But, it is compulsory for both sides to study the hopes and likes of the other side, in order to reach a good family relation, even though, not all these hopes represent all the children's hope….and, likewise, also not all the likes of the parent. It represents the key hopes, which if preserved by both sides, the relationship will be good and acceptable by both the children and parents. The question here is that: Why is it that all these valuable comments remain only hopes?
Why didn't the parent try to fill the empty gap? And why are the children not helping their parents in building the bridge? … or why won't both sides open the door of dialogue in order to realize the hopes of the other side? Stopping the factors that prevent the achievement of these hopes, which if given much consideration by both sides, their goals will be achieved. Indeed, it is something practicable, it is not a miracle or something impossible.
Therefore, there is the need for both sides to understand the reality and the nature of the other sides feelings, his likes and dislikes. This is what we will discuss now: Among the Mistakes of the Parents It might be possible that some will put all the blame on the parents alone, because of the fact that they have much experience in life and that they were expected to be forgiven and possess a wider heart and mind.
Based on these, we will not forgive children, upholding blames on them, when they go against the advice of their parents, especially if they know that they are not suppose to do what they did. However, because the responsibilities of parents are great, we will look into the mistakes of parents, which if it is treated well, the gap between children and parents will be filled.
How can a father, who lived in such a harsh condition and treatment, feel good to see his son in such a situation? Is it good for a father to always shout and beat his children for a minor mistake, and to be talking in a wild and horrible voice in the house as if he is a small executioner?