cit., [^33]: [^10] See Leo Zaibert “Punishment,...

cit., [^33]: [^10] See Leo Zaibert “Punishment, Justifications, and Institutions” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 2003, (30): 51-[^83]: [^11] John Rawls, “Two Concepts of Rules”, op. cit., [^37]: [^12] John Rawls, “Two Concepts of Rules”, op. cit., [^42]: [^13] John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, op. cit., pp. 74 ff, and passim. [^14] John R. Searle, “How to Derive an ‘Ought’ from ‘Is’”, Philosophical Review 73 (1964): 43-[^58]: [^15] John R.

Searle, Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969, p. [^132]: [^16] John R. Searle, Speech Acts, op. cit., p. [^132]: [^17] John R. Searle, Speech Acts, op. cit., p. [^176]: [^18] John R. Searle, Speech Acts, op. cit., p. [^176]: [^19] A. N. Prior, Logic and the Basis of Ethics, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1949) See also David Brink’s discussion of naturalism in his Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 150 ff.

[^20] John R. Searle, Speech Acts, op. cit., p. [^189]: [^21] David Hume, A Treatise Concerning Human Understanding, L. A. Selby-Bigge, (ed.), (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888), pp. 469-[^470]: [^22] G. E. Moore, Principia Ethica, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959) pp. 12-13, and passim. [^23] Karl Popper, The Open Society and its Enemies (revised edition), (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966) Vol. 1, 62-[^79]: [^24] D. D. Raphael, Problems of Political Philosophy, 2nd.

edition, (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1990), p. 175, emphasis added. [^25] D. D. Raphael, Political Philosophy, op. cit., p. [^175]: [^26] D. D. Raphael, Political Philosophy, op. cit., p. [^175]: [^27] John R. Searle, Speech Acts, op. cit., [^187]: [^28] John R. Searle, “How to Derive ‘Ought’ From ‘Is’”, op. cit., p. [^43]: [^29] John R. Searle, The Construction of Social Reality, New York: Free Press, 1995, p. [^120]: [^30] John R.

Searle, Rationality in Action, Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press, 2001, p. [^181]: In the Spanish version of Rationality in Action, which was published earlier than the English version, and which is virtually identical to the latter, it is stated that “all” (not merely “virtually all”) speech acts contain an element of promising. [^31] John R. Searle, Speech Acts, op. cit., [^33]: [^32] John R. Searle, Speech Acts, op. cit., 34 ff.

[^33] See, for example the section entitled “Games and Institutional Reality” in his The Construction of Social Reality, op. cit., 66-[^71]: [^34] H. L. A.