‘IJTEHAD’ \u2013 AGHA MURTAZA MUTAHHARI ‘The Sunnis said...

‘IJTEHAD’ \u2013 AGHA MURTAZA MUTAHHARI ‘The Sunnis said that the valid proofs were four in number: the Book, the Sunna, ijma and ijtihad (qiyas); the Shi`a said the valid proofs were four: the Book, the Sunna, ijma` and `aql (reason). They merely substituted `aql for qiyas.’ Most students of the Hawzas do their Ijtihad in Fiqh, the principles of which are from the Sunni Imam Shafei and have nothing to do with the teachings of the Holy Ahl Ul Baytasws .

This is one of the subjects that was NEVER taught by the Holy Imam Ja’far Al Sadiqasws. There is a record of himasws having taught approximately sixty seven subjects, and this one is NOT on that list. BIHAR UL ANWAAR \u2013 VOL.

2 CHAPTER ON TAQLEED H32 \u0627:# “\u0014\u0015\u0648\u0641\u060c :\u0019 4=\u062f :# \u060c\u00176\u000f\u0019 :\u0019 \u0631\u060c.\u0015# :\u0019 \/\u001d\u060c9\u000f \u001e\u0644: B=\u0015A \u0623# \u0015\u001b*\u0014 \b\u000f\u0018\u0019 \u06276\u0004@\u0645 \u0012&)\u0644: \u06229 ” $\u0004 \u0012D\u0014\u062c “: 9E# (F\/ A\u000fG\u0004 \u06271\u0647 It has been narrated from Ibn Marouf from Hammad Bin Isa from Raba\u2019I from Fudhail who said that he heard the Holy Imam Ja\u2019far Al Sadiq asws that: \u2018Whatsoever that does not come out from this Household is void.\u2019 15 And since this subject does not come from the Holy Household of the Holy Ahl Ul Baytasws, it is therefore invalid.

THE HOLY IMAMasws \u2013 TWO MUJTAHID – NIL 3. Fiqh (Jurisprudence) Fiqh (Jurisprudence) is a major (if not ‘the major’) science around which most of the other subjects revolve. The study of the practical laws of Islam and how to derive them is divided by areas of jurisprudence such as purification, prayers, fasting, hajj, marriage, trade, etc. What can one say about the conclusions derived based on the principles of the Sunni Imam Shafei?

All these rules and regulations that get published in the books of emulation are based on these principles of jurisprudence. Since the principles are void, therefore the end result of these cannot possibly be valid. WASAAIL AL SHIA \u2013 H 33193 [ 33193 ] 43 \u0640 \u000e\u0010\u0011\u0012 \u0001 \u000e\u0010\u0011\u0012 \u0627\u0010\u001aN\u000e- $.