২,৭০৭ নিবন্ধ
Ruling 2249. If a period has been specified for the sharecropping and the period is such that usually produce is harvested by the end of it, but it so
Ruling 2248. If an owner has an agreement with a farmer that an amount of the produce will belong to one of them and the rest of it will be divided be
Ruling 2247. A number of conditions must be fulfilled for sharecropping to be valid: 1. there must be a contract between the two parties. For example,
Ruling 2246. Sharecropping is when an owner of land forms an agreement with a farmer to place the land at his disposal so that the farmer may farm the
Ruling 2245. If the worker leaves the task unfinished, he cannot claim any fee if the offeror had offered the fee for completing the task; for example
Ruling 2244. The worker can choose to leave the task unfinished. However, if leaving the task unfinished would cause harm to the offeror or someone fo
Ruling 2243. If the offeror wishes to annul the reward after the worker has started to perform the task, it is problematic unless he and the worker co
Ruling 2242. The offeror can annul the reward before the worker starts performing the task.
Ruling 2241. If a worker performs the task before or after the contract is concluded with the intention of not taking any money, he does not have the
Ruling 2240. If the fee for the work is completely vague – for example, the offeror says, ‘Whoever finds my child, I will give him some money’, and he
Ruling 2239. It is not necessary that the property being offered be specified with all its particulars; rather, it is sufficient if it is understood b
Ruling 2238. The task that the offeror wishes to be performed for him must not be unlawful (ḥarām), pointless, or an obligatory (wājib) task that must
Ruling 2237. The offeror must be of the age of legal responsibility (bāligh), sane (ʿāqil), have an intention (qaṣd) to make the offer, and make it of
Ruling 2236. A reward is when a person offers to give something in return for a task performed for him. For example, he says, ‘Whoever finds my lost p
Ruling 2235. An owner can invest in things that are sanctioned in Islamic law (mashrūʿ) by way of a ‘reward’ (juʿālah)[1] to achieve the same result h
Ruling 2234. Any loss to or destruction of the sleeping partnership property – for example, it is burnt, stolen, or suchlike – is recompensed by any p
Ruling 2233. In a sleeping partnership contract, both the owner and the worker can stipulate a condition that the other must do something for him or p
Ruling 2232. With a sleeping partnership based on the owner giving the worker permission to trade with his property, the contract becomes void if the
Ruling 2231. If a sleeping partnership contract is non-specific and does not mention any particular restrictions, the worker can buy, sell, and decide
Ruling 2230. A sleeping partnership that is based on the owner giving the worker permission to trade with his property (al‑muḍārabah al‑idhniyyah) is